We experience endlessly, and on top of the flow of seeing, hearing, touching, smelling, tasting, and thinking we project and add a fictional ‘experiencer’, a one, a self who is doing this experiencing.
And yet, there isn’t anyone there to do this. so who or what is experiencing the experiences? ….. the experience itself is in a sense the experiencer! Not as a self, or something separate or added on top of the experience. Just the experience arising in awareness …..
Each moment of experience, as it arises in awareness is just what it is … an experience … and that is all there is.
Nobody is home
Don’t need to project out a self or me who ‘has’ this experience. No need to experience these arisings in mind as being ‘out there’ … things in the world.
No ‘me’, no ‘world’ directly experienced.
Just arisings in mind, momentary and complete.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a74a/7a74a8d73c85572277b3a8a3a23fb55878b0713c" alt="Lights on, Nobody Home by Ashley Wright"
hi al ….
yes indeed, the sense object and the sense organ make contact, and the sense consciousness arises as a result. then the other skandas/khanda’s arise following on from that …
i was using the word ‘experience’ as a short-hand for all five skandas, and the suggestion that the experiencer is actually the experience itself as a poetic way to describe how the process is complete in and of itself, without a self which is needed to be aware of these other aspects. there is just seeing, for example …. and seeing is both the content – experience, and the ‘see-er’ – awareness …. as ‘seeing’ arises, it is both aspects, which we mistakenly seperate out into the experience, and a mythical experiencer ….
take care …..
…I love getting technical – that’s because I read to much – but –
“so who or what is experiencing the experiences?”
Doesn’t consciousness arise as a result of contact?
Still an insubstancial, impermanent, conditioned event, not associated with “I” – yet arising right after the object hits the senses. I have heard it described as the “knowing function”. In Theraveda I believe it is one of the 5 aggregates.
This is pure theory for me – I have yet to fully internalize how this actually unfolds in my experience – but interesting to discuss…………Al